Hi, On Tue, 19 Jun 2007, Alex Riesen wrote: > On 6/19/07, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > Maybe this is the right time to cut off branches/* and remotes/*? > > > > > > Seconded. Don't use the remotes/ since some months now. > > > But... isn't a git package with code of something like 1.4.4 is still > > > in some major distributions? > > > > Yes, AFAICT it is Ubuntu "the most up-to-date distro there is". At least > > many questions on the list and in IRC suggest that. > > > > So, how about checking (at least for a year) in builtin-fetch, if > > "branches/" or "remotes/" exist, and fail, with a nice message how to move > > to config-based remotes? > > ...by suggesting to use a nice conversion script which we don't > have. git.git/contrib/remotes2config.sh IIRC it was explicitely asked to leave branches/* out of that script, but the original version had it, and it should be easy to include it again. > BTW, as far as I can see, git-remote reads old configuration just fine, > so it probably will a very simple script: read all and write all. Well, > the "all" part of it can be a bit complicated, but aside from that... Ciao, Dscho - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
