Re: [GSoC][PATCH v6 11/20] rebase -i: rewrite complete_action() in C

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le 10/08/2018 à 22:27, Junio C Hamano a écrit :
> If we are planning to make all the backend responsible for stashing
> away before they run and applying the stash after they are done,
> then it might make sense to have the application side on the backend
> as the first step.  But if what you need to do to stash away local
> changes and what you need to do to reapply the stash is the same for
> all backends, wouldn't it make more sense to have the logic in the
> caller side?
> 
> 

Yes.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux