Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > Are you sure that it's not well-defined? We open the path with O_APPEND, > which means every write() will be atomically positioned at the end of > file. So we would never lose or overwrite data. > > We do our own buffering in a strbuf, writing the result out in a single > write() call (modulo the OS returning a short write, but that should not > generally happen when writing short strings to a file). So we should get > individual trace lines as atomic units. > > The order of lines from the two processes is undefined, of course. Correct. But I am more worried about the "mixed/overwriting" breakage, if there is one; it means we may need to be prepared for systems that lack O_APPEND that works correctly. I initially just assumed that it was what Dscho was seeing, but after re-reading his message, I am not sure anymore. I think the "do not trace the other side" approach you suggest for these tests that only care about one side is more appropriate solution for this particular case. We then do not have to worry about overwriting or output from both sides mixed randomly. > diff --git a/t/t5552-skipping-fetch-negotiator.sh b/t/t5552-skipping-fetch-negotiator.sh > index 3b60bd44e0..5ad5bece55 100755 > --- a/t/t5552-skipping-fetch-negotiator.sh > +++ b/t/t5552-skipping-fetch-negotiator.sh > @@ -28,6 +28,19 @@ have_not_sent () { > done > } > > +# trace_fetch <client_dir> <server_dir> [args] > +# > +# Trace the packet output of fetch, but make sure we disable the variable > +# in the child upload-pack, so we don't combine the results in the same file. > +trace_fetch () { > + client=$1; shift > + server=$1; shift > + GIT_TRACE_PACKET="$(pwd)/trace" \ > + git -C "$client" fetch \ > + --upload-pack 'unset GIT_TRACE_PACKET; git-upload-pack' \ > + "$server" "$@" > +} > + > test_expect_success 'commits with no parents are sent regardless of skip distance' ' > git init server && > test_commit -C server to_fetch && > @@ -42,7 +55,7 @@ test_expect_success 'commits with no parents are sent regardless of skip distanc > # "c1" has no parent, it is still sent as "have" even though it would > # normally be skipped. > test_config -C client fetch.negotiationalgorithm skipping && > - GIT_TRACE_PACKET="$(pwd)/trace" git -C client fetch "$(pwd)/server" && > + trace_fetch client "$(pwd)/server" && > have_sent c7 c5 c2 c1 && > have_not_sent c6 c4 c3 > ' > @@ -88,7 +101,7 @@ test_expect_success 'when two skips collide, favor the larger one' ' > # the next "have" sent will be "c1" (from "c6" skip 4) and not "c4" > # (from "c5side" skip 1). > test_config -C client fetch.negotiationalgorithm skipping && > - GIT_TRACE_PACKET="$(pwd)/trace" git -C client fetch "$(pwd)/server" && > + trace_fetch client "$(pwd)/server" && > have_sent c5side c11 c9 c6 c1 && > have_not_sent c10 c8 c7 c5 c4 c3 c2 > ' > @@ -114,7 +127,7 @@ test_expect_success 'use ref advertisement to filter out commits' ' > # not need to send any ancestors of "c3", but we still need to send "c3" > # itself. > test_config -C client fetch.negotiationalgorithm skipping && > - GIT_TRACE_PACKET="$(pwd)/trace" git -C client fetch origin to_fetch && > + trace_fetch client origin to_fetch && > have_sent c5 c4^ c2side && > have_not_sent c4 c4^^ c4^^^ > ' > @@ -144,7 +157,7 @@ test_expect_success 'handle clock skew' ' > # and sent, because (due to clock skew) its only parent has already been > # popped off the priority queue. > test_config -C client fetch.negotiationalgorithm skipping && > - GIT_TRACE_PACKET="$(pwd)/trace" git -C client fetch "$(pwd)/server" && > + trace_fetch client "$(pwd)/server" && > have_sent c2 c1 old4 old2 old1 && > have_not_sent old3 > ' > @@ -176,7 +189,7 @@ test_expect_success 'do not send "have" with ancestors of commits that server AC > test_commit -C server commit-on-b1 && > > test_config -C client fetch.negotiationalgorithm skipping && > - GIT_TRACE_PACKET="$(pwd)/trace" git -C client fetch "$(pwd)/server" to_fetch && > + trace_fetch client "$(pwd)/server" to_fetch && > grep " fetch" trace && > > # fetch-pack sends 2 requests each containing 16 "have" lines before