Re: [PATCH 04/11] builtin rebase: support --quiet

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On Wed, Aug 8, 2018 at 6:51 AM Pratik Karki <predatoramigo@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> This commit introduces a rebase option `--quiet`. While `--quiet` is
>> commonly perceived as opposite to `--verbose`, this is not the case for
>> the rebase command: both `--quiet` and `--verbose` default to `false` if
>> neither `--quiet` nor `--verbose` is present.
>>
>> This commit goes further and introduces `--no-quiet` which is the
>> contrary of `--quiet` and it's introduction doesn't modify any
>> behaviour.

Why?  Is it for completeness (i.e. does the scripted version take
such an option and addition of --no-quiet makes the C rewrite behave
the same)?

>> Note: The `flags` field in `rebase_options` will accumulate more bits in
>> subsequent commits, in particular a verbose and a diffstat flag. And as
>> --quoet inthe shell scripted version of the rebase command switches off
>
>   --quote in the
>
> (in case a resend is needed)

Meaning --quiet?




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux