Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Yes I think the earlier approach with the more robust detection you > suggested is probably a good compromise. Junio does that sound good to > you? Surely, and thanks.
Phillip Wood <phillip.wood@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Yes I think the earlier approach with the more robust detection you > suggested is probably a good compromise. Junio does that sound good to > you? Surely, and thanks.
![]() |