Hi, Jeff King wrote: > On Thu, Aug 02, 2018 at 11:21:44PM -0700, Jonathan Nieder wrote: >> Jeff King wrote: >>> I guess you could even replace "COCCI_COMBINED" with "COCCI_PATCH" in >>> most of the targets, and that would let people do individual: >>> >>> make COCCI_PATCH=contrib/coccinelle/foo.cocci coccicheck >> >> The issue here is that the dependencies for foo.cocci become >> unreliable, so I'd rather have a separate target for that (e.g. >> depending on FORCE) if we go that way. > > Can you be more specific? I don't see how it's unreliable, unless you > mean that anything relying on "coccicheck" would depend on the exact > value of COCCI_PATCH. Yes, that's what I mean: changing which COCCI_PATCH to try would need to trigger re-runs. > But it may all be moot anyway, based no the responses elsewhere in the > thread. Sure. Thanks, Jonathan
