On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 09:29:18PM +0100, Oliver Kullmann wrote: > On Mon, Jun 18, 2007 at 09:49:07PM +0200, Alex Riesen wrote: > > Git does not keep "renaming history". It does not have to, as it keeps > > how your project looked at each commit (point in history). > > For my purposes, that is a bad thing, since I want to get rid off some parts > of the history (specifically I want to eliminate some files from history), > as explained in that last paragraph in my e-mail (with the motivation): Oh, so even if somebody checks out a previous version of the project, you don't want them to see that file at the old name any more? The git history is totally immutable, by design--the SHA1 name of a commit is taken over the commit, the contents of the entire tree at that point, and any commit(s) that precede this commit--hence it recursively summarizes the entire history of the project. So if you want to erase all memory of a path from the git history, then you have to rebuild it all. Which is possible--it'd just mean creating a new project and writing a script to import every version into the new project.... --b. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html