On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 7:46 PM Brandon Williams <bmwill@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Could you send a v2 that covers all the push features in pack version > > 1? I see some are discussed but it's probably good to summarize in > > this document too. > > I can mention the ones we want to implement, but I expect that a push v2 > would not require that all features in the current push are supported > out of the box. Some servers may not want to support signed-push, etc. > Also I don't want to have to implement every single feature that exists > before getting something merged. This way follow on series can be > written to implement those as new features to push v2. I thought I wrote this mail but apparently I did not for some unknown reason. My concern here is painting ourselves in the corner and having a rough sketch of how current features will be implemented or replaced in v2 would help reduce that risk. -- Duy
