Re: Hash algorithm analysis

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Brian,

On Tue, 24 Jul 2018, brian m. carlson wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 02:13:07PM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
> > Yup.  I actually was leaning toward saying "all of them are OK in
> > practice, so the person who is actually spear-heading the work gets to
> > choose", but if we picked SHA-256 now, that would not be a choice that
> > Brian has to later justify for choosing against everybody else's
> > wishes, which makes it the best choice ;-)
> 
> This looks like a rough consensus.

As I grew really uncomfortable with having a decision that seems to be
based on hunches by non-experts (we rejected the preference of the only
cryptographer who weighed in, after all, precisely like we did over a
decade ago), I asked whether I could loop in one of our in-house experts
with this public discussion.

Y'all should be quite familiar with his work: Dan Shumow.

Dan, thank you for agreeing to chime in publicly.

Ciao,
Dscho



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux