On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 03:59:24PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote: > Karl Hasselström <kha@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 2007-06-14 14:55:54 -0700, Steven Grimm wrote: > > > >> I've asked this on IRC a couple times and nobody seemed to have a > >> good answer, so: These two tools seem like they are solving the same > >> general problem using similar approaches. They are both under active > >> development. In what areas is each of them stronger than the other? > >> Why would one choose to use one of them instead of the other? > > > > I have never had a close look at guilt, but from what I remember it > > stores patches as plain old plaintext patches (corrections to this > > statement welcome). StGIT uses git's object database. Sorry I missed this thread... > I haven't tried quilt either but, if it uses plain text patches, the > disadvantage might be the losing of the three-way merge when pushing a > patch onto the stack. The solution is to remember which commit the > patch applies to, switch the tree, apply the patch and merge with > HEAD. Catalin: Perhaps a comparison table might be in order? This is most definitely not the first time this question has been asked. > Are the guilt patches accessible as commit objects at the top of the > stack? When you push a patch, you're doing: git-apply && git-commit When you pop a patch, you're doing: git-reset --hard HEAD^ So, once a patch is pushes, it is a separate commit in the git tree, and one can run any valid git command on it. Now, of course the actual implementation is little bit more complex (e.g., using git-write-tree and git-commit-tree, as well as allowing to pop several patches at the same time). > StGIT might have some more features as it is older but I see a lot of > development is going on with guilt. I haven't looked at stgit in a number of months, but stgit most likely has many features which make use of the extra metadata stored. I'm trying to take the simpler approach - most of the time, the user just want to push, refresh, and pop. With that said, there are plenty of useful commands (26 as of now). > I would welcome such a discussion (so please keep me cc'ed) as we can > share the experience with various issues. Same here. One additional thing. About four months ago, I've heard that stgit tends to blow up when you switch branches using git-checkout - guilt of course doesn't :) My information may be outdated, so corrections are welcome. Josef "Jeff" Sipek. -- Hegh QaQ law' quvHa'ghach QaQ puS - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html