Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > The documentation for the fsck.<msg-id> and receive.fsck.<msg-id> > variables was mostly duplicated in two places, with fsck.<msg-id> > making no mention of the corresponding receive.fsck.<msg-id>, and the > same for fsck.skipList. Overall the result reads a lot easily. Especially this part: > + During fsck git may find issues with legacy data which > + wouldn't be generated by current versions of git, and which > + wouldn't be sent over the wire if `transfer.fsckObjects` was > + set. This feature is intended to support working with legacy > + repositories containing such data. that adds only a few sentences and clarifies the impact of "legacy"-ness to this issue rather nicely. I first found it a bit odd that fsck.* and receive.fsck.* are discussed with an apparent asymmetry but it actually is correct, because we haven't introduced fetch.fsck.* at this step in the series. Thanks.
