Hi Junio, On Tue, 17 Jul 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote: > diff --git a/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh b/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh > index 2d189da2f1..b0cef509ab 100755 > --- a/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh > +++ b/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh > @@ -81,11 +81,13 @@ test_expect_success 'rebase -i writes out .git/rebase-merge/author-script in "ed You missed a very long line here. > set_fake_editor && > FAKE_LINES="edit 1" git rebase -i HEAD^ && > test -f .git/rebase-merge/author-script && Why do we need this, if we already have an `eval` later on? > - unset GIT_AUTHOR_NAME GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL GIT_AUTHOR_DATE && > - eval "$(cat .git/rebase-merge/author-script)" && > - test "$(git show --quiet --pretty=format:%an)" = "$GIT_AUTHOR_NAME" && > - test "$(git show --quiet --pretty=format:%ae)" = "$GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL" && > - test "$(git show --quiet --date=raw --pretty=format:@%ad)" = "$GIT_AUTHOR_DATE" > + ( > + sane_unset GIT_AUTHOR_NAME GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL GIT_AUTHOR_DATE && > + eval "$(cat .git/rebase-merge/author-script)" && Why not . .git/rebase-merge/author-script instead? Less roundabout, easier to read, I think. > + test "$(git show --quiet --pretty=format:%an)" = "$GIT_AUTHOR_NAME" && How is this even working without `-s`? *clicketyclick* Ah, --quiet does this. Wait. `git show --quiet` is not even documented. All of those lines are too long, though. I am surprised you did not catch that. Besides, this would be more compact, less repetitive, *and* more readable as test "$(git show -s --date=raw --format=%an,%ae,@%ad)" = \ "$GIT_AUTHOR_NAME,$GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL,$GIT_AUTHOR_DATE" t3404-rebase-interactive.sh already takes 8 minutes (last I checked, anyway) to run on a *fast* machine. There is absolutely no need to introduce even more spawning, not when it is so easily avoided. > + test "$(git show --quiet --pretty=format:%ae)" = "$GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL" && > + test "$(git show --quiet --date=raw --pretty=format:@%ad)" = "$GIT_AUTHOR_DATE" It is a shame that we cannot use %at directly here. > + ) > ' > > test_expect_success 'rebase -i with the exec command' ' Note: this is not a criticism of the original patch. It is a criticism of the review which could really have been better. I also saw that the test_when_finished uses a shell construct that shell script aficionados might like, but these days it is a lot better to use `test_might_fail` instead. Let's do this, then. So here goes, the clean-up patch on top of your 843654e435e (why does it have to be so darned tedious to get from a mail to the corresponding commit in `pu`), in all its glory: -- snipsnap -- diff --git a/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh b/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh index b0cef509ab7..97f0b4bf881 100755 --- a/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh +++ b/t/t3404-rebase-interactive.sh @@ -75,18 +75,16 @@ test_expect_success 'rebase --keep-empty' ' test_line_count = 6 actual ' -test_expect_success 'rebase -i writes out .git/rebase-merge/author-script in "edit" that sh(1) can parse' ' - test_when_finished "git rebase --abort ||:" && +test_expect_success 'rebase -i writes correct author-script' ' + test_when_finished "test_might_fail git rebase --abort" && git checkout master && set_fake_editor && FAKE_LINES="edit 1" git rebase -i HEAD^ && - test -f .git/rebase-merge/author-script && ( sane_unset GIT_AUTHOR_NAME GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL GIT_AUTHOR_DATE && - eval "$(cat .git/rebase-merge/author-script)" && - test "$(git show --quiet --pretty=format:%an)" = "$GIT_AUTHOR_NAME" && - test "$(git show --quiet --pretty=format:%ae)" = "$GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL" && - test "$(git show --quiet --date=raw --pretty=format:@%ad)" = "$GIT_AUTHOR_DATE" + . .git/rebase-merge/author-script && + test "$(git show -s --date=raw --format=%an,%ae,@%ad)" = \ + "$GIT_AUTHOR_NAME,$GIT_AUTHOR_EMAIL,$GIT_AUTHOR_DATE" ) '
