Re: [PATCH 1/2] introduce "banned function" list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 10:40 PM Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> There are a few standard C functions (like strcpy) which are
> easy to misuse. We generally discourage these in reviews,
> but we haven't put advice in CodingGuidelines, nor provided
> any automated enforcement. The latter is especially
> important because it's more consistent, and it can often
> save a round-trip of review.
>
> Let's start by banning strcpy() and sprintf(). It's not
> impossible to use these correctly, but it's easy to do so
> incorrectly, and there's always a better option.

Is it possible to extend this to ban variables as well? I'm still
going to delete the_index from library code. Once that work is done I
will ban it from entering again (it's only allowed in builtin/ for
example). The next target after that would be the_repository.

Right now I will do this by not declaring the variable [2], which ends
up with a much less friendly compile warning. I did something similar
[1] in an earlier iteration but did not do extensive research on this
topic like you did.

[1] https://public-inbox.org/git/20180606073933.14755-1-pclouds@xxxxxxxxx/T/
[2] https://public-inbox.org/git/20180616054157.32433-16-pclouds@xxxxxxxxx/
-- 
Duy



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux