Re: Q: Ignore ./foo, but not script/foo

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: Q: Ignore ./foo, but not script/foo
From: Konstantin Khomoutov <kostix@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2018 12:22:46 +0300
Cc: 3Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason <avarab@xxxxxxxxx>, Ulrich Windl <Ulrich.Windl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, git@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20180719090656.GA18624@sleipnir>
References: <5B503FF0020000A10002C6B5@gwsmtp1.uni-regensburg.de> <8736wfd579.fsf@evledraar.gmail.com> <20180719090656.GA18624@sleipnir>
User-agent: NeoMutt/20170306 (1.8.0)

On Thu, Jul 19, 2018 at 07:06:57PM +1000, Timothy Rice wrote:

[...]
> Most people do put "." in their PATH for convenience
[...]

IMO this is a gross overstatement: personally, I know of no person using
a Unix-like operation system who does this.

References:
- Q: Ignore ./foo, but not script/foo
  - From: Ulrich Windl
- Re: Q: Ignore ./foo, but not script/foo
  - From: 3Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason
- Re: Q: Ignore ./foo, but not script/foo
  - From: Timothy Rice

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] sequencer.c: terminate the last line of author-script properly
Next by Date: Re: Q: Ignore ./foo, but not script/foo
Previous by thread: Re: Q: Ignore ./foo, but not script/foo
Next by thread: Re: Q: Ignore ./foo, but not script/foo
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]

Powered by Linux