Duy Nguyen <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> In other words: if you see something that you don't like about >> GitGitGadget, get your butts off the ground and contribute a fix. > > Thank you for the frank words. I will choose to not review any mails > coming from GitGitGadget. I wouldn't say I will choose not to, but certainly I noticed that I'd backburner reading a series that are way out of order in my mailbox, no matter who authored them or how they were sent out, as they consume way more concentration-point out of my mind than they are often worth X-<. While there are easier-to-read and more nicely organized patch series, I'd deal with them first, consciously or not. No, fixing a tool that throws such a harder-to-read patch series in reader's mailbox is *not* something I'd spend my primary focus on, especially when many contributors are perfectly capable of sending reasonably formatted series without using such a tool under development. That won't stop those who want to improve the tool. But I'd wish those who want to make Git better spend their time on making Git, over making GitGitGadget, better.
