Re: [PATCH 00/16] Consolidate reachability logic

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 02:40:21PM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 12:18 PM Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 02:54:38PM +0100, Ramsay Jones wrote:
> > > This is not your problem, but I find these GitGitGadget
> > > submissions somewhat annoying. This series has been spewed
> > > all over my in-box in, what I assume, is commit date order.
> > >
> > > So, patches #4,5 dated 19/06, then #1,2,3 dated 25/06,
> > > then #15 dated 28/06, then #6,7 dated 12/07, then #8-16
> > > dated 13/07, then 00/16 dated today.
> >
> > Yeah, they're out of order in mutt's threaded display. And the
> > back-dating means there's a much higher chance of them getting blocked
> > as spam (e.g., some of the dates are from weeks ago).
> >
> > git-send-email uses the current time minus an offset, and then
> > monotonically increases for each patch:
> 
> Junio pointed this out to gitgitgadget developers in [1], which led to
> an issue being opened[2]. That issue was merged today.
> 
> [1]: https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqq7em7gg3j.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
> [2]: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/gitgitgadget/pull/15

I was going to say "oh good, fixed", but it looks like it just merged
adding that line to the TODO list. :)

Still, it looks like wheels are in motion, which is nice.

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux