Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] gpg-interface: introduce new config to select per gpg format program

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 12:56:38PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 12:54:13PM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
> 
> > Should we allow:
> > 
> >   [gpg "OpenPGP"]
> >   program = whatever
> > 
> > given that we allow:
> > 
> >   [gpg]
> >   format = OpenPGP
> > 
> > ? I think just using strcasecmp() here would be sufficient. But I wonder
> > if it is a symptom of using the wrong tool (subsections) when we don't
> > need it.
> 
> I did just read the discussion in response to v1, where everybody told
> you the opposite. ;)
> 
> So I guess my question/points are more for brian and Junio.

I'm okay with us forcing "openpgp".  That seems sane enough for now, and
if people scream loudly, we can loosen it.
-- 
brian m. carlson: Houston, Texas, US
OpenPGP: https://keybase.io/bk2204

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux