> As we discussed during the review on v1, ":/<substring in commit>" > is *NOT* pathspec (that is why having these tests in t4208 is wrong > but we are following existing mistakes). Ah, I understand the terminology better now. Thanks. I'll change the commit message wording to use "extended SHA-1s" instead of "pathspecs". > Now you have Peff's sign-off for the one-liner code change, the last > one is redundant. Okay: I'll remove the "Based-on-patch-by" line. > Other than the above two nits, the patch looks good. I would have > broken the line after "including HEAD.", but the slightly-long line > is also OK. Happy to change this while making the above edits. :-) Best, WC