Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: >> That may be something worth discussing before doing; I'd prefer to >> wait until these 6 patches, plus the unsized static array one you >> did spearately, graduates to the 'master' branch. > > If this change to DEVOPTS was done as 7/7, then this would be very easy to > guarantee (or as 2/2 if you want to graduate this here patch series faster > than the static array forward-declaration fix). It would guarantee that there is *no* period to discuss if it is too inconvenient for developers between the time these 6 plus 1 graduate to the master branch (and willing volunteers have chance to try it themselves) and the change actuallly is forced upon the developers. That is why I said I'd prefer to wait. A separate patch that depends on the 6 plus 1 topic that is kept in 'next' longer than the main series is a possibility, though.
