Re: [PATCH 0/3] rebase -r: support octopus merges

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



"Johannes Schindelin via GitGitGadget" <gitgitgadget@xxxxxxxxx>
writes:

> The `--rebase-merges` option of `git rebase` generates todo lists that include the merge commits that are to be rebased.
>
> To keep things simpler to review, I decided to support only regular, 2-parent merge commits first.
>
> With this patch series, support is extended to cover also octopus merges.

;-)

To be honest, I am not sure if there still are people who use
octopus (even though I freely admit that I am guilty of inventing
the term and the mechanism), given its downsides, primary one of
which is that it makes bisection less efficient.

Nevertheless, this *is* the right thing to do from feature
completeness point of view.  Thanks for following it through.

>
> Johannes Schindelin (3):
>   merge: allow reading the merge commit message from a file
>   rebase --rebase-merges: add support for octopus merges
>   rebase --rebase-merges: adjust man page for octopus support
>
>  Documentation/git-merge.txt  |  10 ++-
>  Documentation/git-rebase.txt |   7 +-
>  builtin/merge.c              |  32 +++++++
>  sequencer.c                  | 168 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
>  t/t3430-rebase-merges.sh     |  34 +++++++
>  5 files changed, 204 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>
>
> base-commit: e3331758f12da22f4103eec7efe1b5304a9be5e9
> Published-As: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/releases/tags/pr-8%2Fdscho%2Fsequencer-and-octopus-merges-v1
> Fetch-It-Via: git fetch https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git pr-8/dscho/sequencer-and-octopus-merges-v1
> Pull-Request: https://github.com/gitgitgadget/git/pull/8



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux