Re: Git 2.18: RUNTIME_PREFIX... is it working?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> If I understand correctly, the Linux implementation requires reading
> from /proc. So an executable that only did RUNTIME_PREFIX (with no
> fallback to static paths) would be unhappy inside a chroot or other
> container that didn't mount /proc.

If we need /proc, wouldn't we _already_ be unhappy inside a chroot
that didn't mount /proc, even _with_ fallback to static paths?
Last I knew, the whole point of chroots/containers/jails/etc. was to
prevent access, from a process running inside the container, to any
part of the FS that's outside of the container.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux