Re: tags and patches

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/14/07, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote:
Hi,

On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Geoff Russell wrote:

> On 6/13/07, Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, 13 Jun 2007, Geoff Russell wrote:
> >
> > > Dear gits,
> >
> > ;-)
> >
> > > [...]
> > >
> > >        git tag v1.1
> > >        git format-patch v1.0
> > >        cd /tmp/newmyrepo
> > >        git am ~/myrepo/THEPATCHNAME
> > >
> > > Where is tag v1.1 ?
> >
> > Tags are not propagated with patches. Sorry.
>
> Is this considered to be a bug to be eventually fixed or a feature?

AFAIK patches are not supposed to _contain_ patches.

Is this a typo? I expected patches to contain tags, not other patches.


What you want is probably a bundle. You don't want a collection of diffs
with comments on them, but you want a collection to reacreate the history
the other side has.

I didn't know about bundles but do now.  However "git bundle --help" tells
me "No manual entry for git-bundle" despite
git-bundle.html being in the Documentation directory.

I'm trying to work out if I want to use git to manage a software distribution
problem. I distribute release v1.0 to people then later I want to email them
a patch to take them from v1.0 to v1.1.  I can probably live without
the tags, but
am just surprised that patches don't send them.


Cheers,
Geoff


Ciao,
Dscho


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux