Re: [PATCH 2/2] sequencer: don't say BUG on bogus input

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Peff,

On Mon, 9 Jul 2018, Jeff King wrote:

> diff --git a/sequencer.c b/sequencer.c
> index f692b2ef44..234666b980 100644
> --- a/sequencer.c
> +++ b/sequencer.c
> @@ -3637,7 +3637,7 @@ int sequencer_pick_revisions(struct replay_opts *opts)
>  			return error(_("revision walk setup failed"));
>  		cmit = get_revision(opts->revs);
>  		if (!cmit || get_revision(opts->revs))
> -			return error("BUG: expected exactly one commit from walk");
> +			return error(_("empty commit set passed"));

Should this not rather be

-		if (!cmit || get_revision(opts->revs))
-			return error("BUG: expected exactly one commit from walk");
+		if (!cmit)
+			return error(_("empty commit set passed"));
+		if (get_revision(opts->revs))
+			return error(_("unexpected extra commit from walk"));

Ciao,
Dscho



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux