Re: What's (not) cooking

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Derrick Stolee <stolee@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 7/6/2018 6:57 PM, Junio C Hamano wrote:
>> I'll be pushing out the integration branches with some updates, but
>> there is no change in 'next' and below.  The following topics I gave
>> a quick look and gave them topic branches, but I had trouble merging
>> them in 'pu' and making them work correctly or pass the tests, so
>> they are not part of 'pu' in today's pushout.
>>
>>      pk/rebase-in-c
>>      en/dirty-merge-fixes
>>      en/t6036-merge-recursive-tests
>>      en/t6042-insane-merge-rename-testcases
>>      ds/multi-pack-index
>
> I tested merging ds/multi-pack-index against the latest pu and the
> only issue I had was with header files being added to 'packfile.c' and
> 'building/repack.c'. Both were that I added "#include <midx.h>" and
> cc/remote-odb added "#include <remote-odb.h>".

I think ds/multi-pack-index didn't have any difficult textual merge
conflicts.  I ran out of time making 'pu' build with new topics and
listed the ones that were left behind.  As Elijah already
identified, there was a bad apple not listed above that was in 'pu'
that made the tests fail, so the above is not even a complete list
of "bad" topics.  It was merely an "I have them but 'pu' doesn't
include them" list.

Thanks.



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux