On Thu, 2007-06-14 09:19:57 +1200, Martin Langhoff <martin.langhoff@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 6/14/07, Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 2007-06-13 08:35:57 +1200, Martin Langhoff > ><martin.langhoff@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On 6/13/07, Claudio Scordino <cloud.of.andor@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Doesn't exist any way to make it simpler ? > > > > > > I think most people setup gitweb, and follow its rss feed. Not exacty > > > the same, I know, but quite useful. > > > > Erm, no, not really. Emailing the patches is *quite* useful when > > there's a dedicated review team. > > I'm sure the review team can read the RSS feed ;-) I've also seen > RSS-to-IMAP gateways that make it easy to "reply" to the patch from > your MUA. Well, why import it to the mail platform via RSS when there's a direct way:) Almost all interesting patches require review (and commenting), and we're working with the email client all the day. So it's just straight forward ;-) MfG, JBG -- Jan-Benedict Glaw jbglaw@xxxxxxxxxx +49-172-7608481 Signature of: "really soon now": an unspecified period of time, likly to the second : be greater than any reasonable definition of "soon".
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature