Alban Gruin <alban.gruin@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
> -enum check_level {
> - CHECK_IGNORE = 0, CHECK_WARN, CHECK_ERROR
> -};
> -
> -static enum check_level get_missing_commit_check_level(void)
> +enum missing_commit_check_level get_missing_commit_check_level(void)
The new name definitely is better than "check_level" in the global
context, but "missing_commit" is much less important thing to say
than "this symbol is to be used when driving 'rebase' (or even
'rebase-i')", I think. "enum rebase_i_drop_commit_check" with
"get_rebase_i_drop_commit_check()" perhaps?
