On Tue, Jul 03, 2018 at 12:55:19PM -0400, Jeff King wrote: > We don't need to use backslash continuation, as the "&&" > already provides continuation (and happily soaks up empty > lines between commands). OK. That seems correct according to my recollection. > We can also expand the multi-line printf into a > here-document, which lets us use line breaks more naturally > (and avoids another continuation that required us to break > the natural indentation). The patch below seems obviously correct to me, for what my $.02 is worth :-). > Signed-off-by: Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> Thanks, Taylor
