Re: What's cooking in git.git (Jun 2018, #07; Thu, 28)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stefan Beller <sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

>> * jt/remove-pack-bitmap-global (2018-06-21) 2 commits
>>  - pack-bitmap: add free function
>>  - pack-bitmap: remove bitmap_git global variable
>>
>>  The effort to move globals to per-repository in-core structure
>>  continues.
>
> This is mostly done, though Peff seems to expect a reroll with
> clarification on how the series is structured?
> https://public-inbox.org/git/20180611211033.GB26235@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/

That one has been resolved by squashing the updated log message in,
I think, so we should be able to merge it down.

>> * sb/submodule-move-head-error-msg (2018-06-25) 1 commit
>>  - submodule.c: report the submodule that an error occurs in
>>
>>  Needs a reroll.
>>  cf. <20180622081713.5360-1-szeder.dev@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> https://public-inbox.org/git/xmqqmuviq2n7.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/
>
> suggests that you applied that change and a reroll would not be needed.

Yup, I forgot about that one.  Thanks.

> It is easy to quantify how often we are bitten by code churn
> (that you call useless here); and very hard to quantify bugs

By definition, churn is useless.  Useful ones are refactoring ;-).

And when you do want to operate on _the_ single in-core instance,
not having to say &the_index in the argument and use $foo_cache()
function does *not* become a source of "bugs".  It just saves
typing, and turning it to $foo_index(&the_index,...) does *not* make
it less error prone.

>> * sb/diff-color-move-more (2018-06-25) 11 commits
>>  - diff: fix a sparse 'dubious one-bit signed bitfield' error
>>  - SQUASH??? t/4015 GETTEXT_POISON emergency fix
>>  - SQUASH????? Documentation breakage emergency fix
> [...]
>>
>>  "git diff --color-moved" feature has further been tweaked.
>>
>>  Needs to be cleaned-up with various fix-up bits applied inline.
>
> I'll resend with those squashes and another (test-)fix SZEDER
> mentioned soon.

The interdiff of the topic looked alright.  Thanks.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux