Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> writes: > Yeah, this solution seems sensible. Given that we would never report any > error for that blob, there is no point in even looking at it. I wonder > if we ought to do the same for other types, too. Is there any point in > opening a tree that is in the skiplist? Suppose the tree is listed there only because it has one entry for a subtree with leading 0 in its mode. We do want to ignore that format violation, but we still want to learn the fact that the subtree it points at and its contents are connected and not dangling, so we do need to open it. Is that open done in a separate phase?
