Hi Junio, On Wed, 27 Jun 2018, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@xxxxxx> writes: > > > git rev-list --bisect-all --first-parent F..E >revs && > > # only E, e1..e8 should be listed, nothing else > > test_line_count = 9 revs && > > for rev in E e1 e2 e3 e4 e5 e6 e7 e8 > > do > > grep "^$(git rev-parse $rev) " revs || return > > done > > > > I am faster by... a lot. Like, seconds instead of minutes. > > I'm fine either way. I just thought you would not want 9 separate > invocations of grep ;-) I don't. I like the unnecessary test_commit calls even less ;-) And yes, we could avoid those `grep` calls, I know. By something as convoluted as revs="$(cat revs)" && for rev in $(git rev-parse E e1 e2 e3 e4 e5 e6 e7 e8) do case "$LF$revs" in *"$LF$rev "*) ;; # okay *) echo "Missing: $rev">&2; return 1;; esac done Is this really what you would call an easy-to-understand test? Maybe for you, a Unix oldtimer and shell scripting king. Ciao, Dscho
