On 06/26, Junio C Hamano wrote: > Brandon Williams <bmwill@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > Expand the transport fetch method signature, by adding an output > > parameter, to allow transports to return information about the refs they > > have fetched. Then communicate shallow status information through this > > mechanism instead of by modifying the input list of refs. > > Makes sense. Would this mechanism also allow us to be more explicit > about the "tag following"? > Yes most likely. We could change it so that when a packfile is sent the result of tag following could be sent along too (the actual tag refs themselves that is) instead of having the client rely on the ref advertisement for tag following. -- Brandon Williams
