Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] t3418: add testcase showing problems with rebase -i and strategy options

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 9:54 AM, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> +       (
> +               PATH=./test-bin:$PATH
> +               test_must_fail git rebase -i -s funny -Xopt -Xfoo master topic
> +       ) &&
>
> +       (
> +               PATH=./test-bin:$PATH
> +               git rebase --continue
> +       ) &&
>
> and it would be reasonable to assume that these variable assignments
> would not fail.  IOW, there is no BUG in breaking &&-chain at these
> two places.  It is merely that the automated mechanism introduced by
> step 29/29 of that other series does not understand that (which is
> expected).  It is not wrong to have && at the end of the assignment,
> though.
>
> Having said that, it would be simpler for at least the latter to
> write it using a single-shot environment assignment, perhaps?  I.e.
>
>         PATH=./test-bin:$PATH git rebase --continue &&
>
> without running in a subshell?

Seems reasonable.  Since these tests were essentially copies of other
tests within the same file, just for rebase -i instead of -m, should I
also add another patch to the series fixing up the rebase -m testcase
to also replace the subshell with a single-shot environment
assignment?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux