On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 04:38:45PM +0200, Pierre Habouzit wrote: > On Wed, Jun 13, 2007 at 09:14:32AM -0500, Bill Lear wrote: > > We have some CVS users who complain that they cannot do a pull > > into a dirty working tree, as they could under CVS. Here is > > their scenario: they make a few changes to their code and want > > to test it out; someone else pushes changes to the central repo > > that they then want to add to their working tree to test also; > > they then want to pull in these changes and test everything, as > > if they had done 'mv stuff stuff-; git pull; mv stuff- stuff'. > > > > They would like an option (perhaps a config option) to do a "dirty > > pull". > > > > The git-merge documentation states: > > > > You may have local modifications in the working tree files. In other > > words, git-diff is allowed to report changes. However, the merge uses > > your working tree as the working area, and in order to prevent the > > merge operation from losing such changes, it makes sure that they do > > not interfere with the merge. Those complex tables in read-tree > > documentation define what it means for a path to "interfere with the > > merge". And if your local modifications interfere with the merge, > > again, it stops before touching anything. > > > > But my colleagues are still wondering: why can't git just do it as > > CVS does? > > > > I know there are workarounds: I myself documented a set of commands > > to "put things on a shelf", but they still are whining. > > > > I need a convincing argument: not a technical one, but one that is > > practical (e.g. where CVS would do harm that git is preventing). > > > > So, any explanation that I can give them why we can't have a 'git pull > > --dirty' that moves things out of the way, then does the merge, then > > moves thing back, aside from that it is stupid? > > I suppose the following way would work: > > $ git commit -a -m "temporary commit" # save current work > $ git branch -f dirty # ..in a separate branch > $ git reset --hard HEAD~1 # unwind this commit > $ git pull # perform a clean pull > $ git rebase master dirty # rewrite the work > <you may have to fix some conficts here> > $ git reset master # "undo" the commit okay this is wrong because you would then "live" in the `dirty` branch. So you'd have to do sth like: git checkout master git diff master..dirty | git apply -- ·O· Pierre Habouzit ··O madcoder@xxxxxxxxxx OOO http://www.madism.org
Attachment:
pgpln25BYacUy.pgp
Description: PGP signature