Am 26.06.2018 um 11:21 schrieb Eric Sunshine:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 4:58 AM Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 12:29 AM, Eric Sunshine <sunshine@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
+ p4 help client &&
+ test_must_fail p4 help nosuchcommand
same question?
Same answer. Not shown in this patch, but just above the context lines
you will find this comment in the file:
# We rely on this behavior to detect for p4 move availability.
which means that the test is really interested in being able to
reliably detect if a sub-command is or is not available. So, despite
the (somewhat) misleading test title, this test doesn't care about the
exact error code but rather cares only that "p4 help nosuchcommand"
errors out, period. Hence, test_must_fail() again agrees with the
spirit of the test.
test_must_fail ensures that only "proper" failures are diagnosed as
expected; failures due to signals such as SEGV are not expected failures.
In the test suite we expect all programs that are not our "git" to work
correctly; in particular, that they do not crash on anything that we ask
them to operate on. Under this assumption, the protection given by
test_must_fail is not needed.
Hence, these lines should actually be
p4 help client &&
! p4 help nosuchcommand
-- Hannes
