On 6/13/07, Marco Costalba <mcostalba@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Some weeks ago I've started to experiment with git-log as a replacement for git-rev-list (as suggested by Linus in a thread). I found some problems and so I stopped
Now I remember why I've quit with git-log: due to a big performance regression under Windows. I've made some tests on a git tree copied under Windows: running: git rev-list --header --parents --boundary HEAD > tmp.txt 1,38s 1,37s 1,39s then running: git log --pretty=raw -z --parents --boundary HEAD > tmp.txt 8,87s 8,87s 8,86s 8,86s So at the end git-log seems 6,4 times slower the git-rev-list ! This would mean the end of the story for me. Marco - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
