Re: [PATCH v1 2/8] Add initial odb remote support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Christian Couder <christian.couder@xxxxxxxxx> writes:

> For each promisor remote I think it makes no sense to have more than
> one remote odb pointing to it. So I am not sure what to do here.

If it makes no sense, then detecting and erroring out would be a
sensible thing to do, no?



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux