Re: The state of the object store series

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



[My email client says I sent this two days ago, but it doesn't appear on public-inbox.org, so somehow it didn't land on-list (Stefan pointed out that the message was in HTML). Repeating the message now so I can reference it in another discussion. -Stolee]

On 6/19/2018 6:07 PM, Stefan Beller wrote:
There is an ongoing effort to remove global state currently and switch over
to pass around the relevant data structures; for most of it we end up passing
around 'the_repository' as it contains everything there is.

Merged into master:

fcb6df32546 Merge branch 'sb/oid-object-info'
a2cec42213c Merge branch 'sb/object-store-replace'
3a1ec60c43b Merge branch 'sb/packfiles-in-repository'
cf0b1793ead Merge branch 'sb/object-store'

Currently cooking:

8c69a7d7e80 Merge branch 'sb/object-store-grafts' into pu
42d32d07298 Merge branch 'sb/object-store-alloc' into jch

(both marked for "will merge to next" in the cooking report)

Floating on the mailing list, not cooking yet:

"sb/object-store-lookup" https://public-inbox.org/git/20180613230522.55335-1-sbeller@xxxxxxxxxx/ This clashes with other series in flight (Stolees get_tree series; see https://public-inbox.org/git/709bd61c-70fc-a925-efba-58ab9be265c9@xxxxxxxxx/ I'll rebase this series on top of that series once the currently cooking series stabilize) "nd/kill-the_index" https://public-inbox.org/git/20180616054157.32433-1-pclouds@xxxxxxxxx/ This converts the_index to pass around index pointers instead of the_repository; it fits into the theme, but Duys end goal differs from mine; he is less submodule focused. Work that still needs to be done: "xx/object-store-commit-graph"
   Convert the commit graph to have no global state, but be part of the
   repository struct. I think this can go in parallel to
"sb/object-store-lookup",
   so I'll tackle that next. Thanks Stolee for looking ahead: There is only the
   commit graph itself as well as whether it has been prepared as a global
   variable. So this series will consist of passing around a repository struct
   for all those higher level functions that do not pass around the commit graph
   or parts of it.

There are some patches in ds/commit-graph-fsck that would be helpful for this effort, and may be easier for you to take.

Specifically, these ones:

 - commit-graph: load a root tree from specific graph
 - commit: force commit to parse from object database
 - commit-graph: parse commit from chosen graph

I'm waiting for sb/object-store-lookup to be in 'next' before I re-roll that branch. If you're not in a rush to send this series, perhaps wait for the next version here.

"xx/finish-object-stores"
   This requires "xx/object-store-commit-graph" as well as
"sb/object-store-lookup";
   it will convert parse_commit[_gently] to take a repository argument and will
   finish the actual object store part. This might be optional for the goal of
   converting submodules, that I have in mind, but it sure is a nice finishing
   touch.

"xx/convert-revision-walking"
   This series aims to convert get_merge_bases(), in_merge_bases() and all its
   revision walking code to take a repository argument.

I'm playing around with a series that groups most commit walks into one file, so they can share more code and we can more easily test their correctness and performance. I'll send an RFC sometime that will absolutely collide with this one, but I expect a full v1 patch will be based on this series.

Thanks,

-Stolee




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux