Re: [PATCH] Makefile: make NO_ICONV really mean "no iconv"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 02:30:43AM -0400, Eric Sunshine wrote:

> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 12:20 AM Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > We have OLD_ICONV, too, which should probably do nothing if NO_ICONV is
> > set. I think that works OK. We end up setting -DOLD_ICONV on the command
> > line, but that's only consider inside "#ifndef NO_ICONV" within the
> > code.
> 
> Right, that was my conclusion, as well. Since it works as is, I'm not
> sure suppressing -DOLD_ICONV in Makefile is worth the extra patch
> noise. I can re-roll with that change too, if someone thinks it's
> worthwhile, though.

Nah, I was just thinking out loud. I don't think it's worth changing the
Makefile (and I wouldn't be surprised if there are other "dependent"
cases like this that work just fine because of the #ifdefs in the code).

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux