Taylor Blau <me@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > Since it's past the date that I said I would re-roll this, I wanted to > provide a quick update. I am back in the office, and have discovered a > new wrinkle that `--invert --not -e ...` prints a column offset of 1, > when it should recover the pattern and display the offset of the pattern > match, treating the double negation as a no-op. > > I am going to continue to polish this until I can figure out a clean way > to work around this issue. Sorry for the delay. No need to be sorry; there is no need, especially after we hit the -rc0 mark, to rush a topic that is about a new feature. Thanks for an update, anyway.
