On Sat, Jun 09 2018, brian m. carlson wrote: > Since there's been a lot of questions recently about the state of the > NewHash work, I thought I'd send out a summary. Thanks for all your work on this. > I know that we have long tried to avoid discussing the specific > algorithm to use, in part because the last discussion generated more > heat than light, and settled on referring to it as NewHash for the time > being. However, I think it's time to pick this topic back up, since I > can't really continue work in this direction without us picking a > NewHash. > > If people are interested, I've done some analysis on availability of > implementations, performance, and other attributes described in the > transition plan and can send that to the list. Let's see it!
