Re: [PATCH v4 00/23] Fix incorrect use of the_index

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Jun 7, 2018 at 12:44 AM, Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 9:49 AM, Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> v4 fixes some commit messages and killed a couple more the_index
>> references after I tried to merge this with 'pu'
>
> Thanks for tackling this.  The first 8 patches look good to me other
> than the typo I pointed out on patch 4.  However, my eyes glazed over
> a bit on the attr.c stuff in patch 7 that you specifically mentioned
> in the commit message, so my "looks good" doesn't count for as much on
> that one.

I re-read the attr.c stuff in patch 7; looks good to me and the new
series makes the code much more readable in the end.

> I'm getting sleepy, but I'll try to circle back and look over the rest
> of the patches in the next few days.

I read over the rest.  Found a small grammatical error in a commit
message.  Found multiple places that still need conversion, from
pushing up &the_index usages to callers of ll-merge.c and sha1-file.c
instead of having them in those files, to mixes of _cache_ and _index_
functions as in apply.c and merge-recursive.c.  However, Duy pointed
out there was more work to do, and this series is a step in the right
direction and a good start.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux