On Sat, Jun 09, 2018 at 10:50:36AM +0200, Martin Ågren wrote: > On 9 June 2018 at 10:32, Jeff King <peff@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Except it _does_ do one non-trivial thing, which is call the > > report() function, which wants us to pass a pointer to a > > "struct object". Which we don't have (we have only a "struct > > object_id"). So we erroneously passed the NULL object, which > > s/passed/dereferenced/? Probably doesn't affect the fix though. Well, we passed it, and then that function dereferenced it. :) I'm going to re-roll for the minor bits that Eric pointed out, so I'll try to word this better. -Peff
