On Fri, Jun 08, 2018 at 08:26:57AM +0200, Peter Backes wrote: > > If you run a website where the world can access a repository, you are > responsible for obeying the GDPR with respect to that repository. If > you receive a request to be forgotten, you have to make sure you stop > publishing that author's identity as part of the repository. > *Anyone* can run a repository. It's not just github and gitlab. The hobbiest in New Zealand, who might never visit Europe (so she can't be arrested when she visits the fair shores of Europe) and who has no business interests in Europe, can host such a web site. So the person trying to engage in censorship would need to contact *everyone*. And someone who has a git note in their private repo who then pushes to github/gitlab would end up pushing that note back up to the web server. > You do NOT need to > > - delete it from a private copy you have > - care about others who publish that data > - or even make sure the data is deleted from private copies others may > have, even if the number of copies is in the thousands. Great, so you can get github and gitlab to get rid of the information. But it's *pointless*. And given that real developers really do care about who authored a patch, and regularly will do operations that reference the authorship information, the fact that it is stored somewhere else (e.g., in a git note, per your proposal), *will* slow down those operations. > In practical terms, if someone wishes to exercise his right to be > forgotten, he will usually send the request to the maintainer and stop > him from distributing the information, and perhaps to a third party he > might use as a platform for publication, such as github. Your problem is in the word: "a" - Ted
