On 6/12/07, Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Martin Langhoff" <martin.langhoff@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > It _will_ be a bit of an apple-to-oranges comparison, but you could > use a few large-ish projects that have a published GIT gateway. > ... > - cvs status vs git status This _is_ apples and oranges.
_All_ of them are ;-) git-log is _not_ the same as cvs log. And a clone is not the same as a checkout, ever. Perhaps diff is the only reasonable comparison. However, the benchmarks doco can show the comparative numbers and explain how those are different. Which is a great alibi to explain why almost all the git ops are insanely faster * and some of the interesting concepts behind git. * - except clone - but mention "--references" to speed it up)
people seem to use "cvs -q update -n" often when they want to know "what's different between me and upstream"?
I'm one of those ;-)
- "git am a-dozen-of-mails" vs its cvs equivalent. - "git rebase a-dozen-of-commits" vs its cvs equivalent.
Don't thing those exist. cheers martin - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
