Ramsay Jones wrote: [...] > I don't run the p4 or svn tests, so ... :-D Heh, lucky you. :) I try to run them all as part of the fedora builds since they cover much more than I'd ever use. That's the main reason I noticed the bare python. That would trip me up when it came time to build on a near-future fedora where python isn't installed by default and I only wanted to require python3 for the build/runtime scripts. > On 06/06/18 22:03, Jeff King wrote: >> really the only user in the whole code base outside of a few fringe >> commands). Leaving aside any perl vs python flame-war, I think there's >> value in keeping the number of languages limited when there's not a >> compelling reason to do otherwise. > > I agree that fewer languages is (generally) a good idea. Yep, that's certainly even better and if Jeff H. can use perl relatively easily (or one of the many perl folks here can help with that part of the test), that's great. The best way to solve many problems is avoid having them. :) Thanks, -- Todd ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Chaos, panic, and disorder - my job is done here.