Both functions that are updated in this commit are called by verify_absent(), which is part of the "unpack-trees" operation that is supposed to work on any index file specified by the caller. Thanks to Brandon [1] [2], an implicit dependency on the_index is exposed. This commit fixes it. In both functions, it makes sense to use src_index to check for exclusion because it's almost unchanged and should give us the same outcome as if running the exclude check before the unpack. It's "almost unchanged" because we do invalidate cache-tree and untracked cache in the source index. But this should not affect how exclude machinery uses the index: to see if a file is tracked, and to read a blob from the index instead of worktree if it's marked skip-worktree (i.e. it's not available in worktree) [1] a0bba65b10 (dir: convert is_excluded to take an index - 2017-05-05 [2] 2c1eb10454 (dir: convert read_directory to take an index - 2017-05-05) Helped-by: Elijah Newren <newren@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Nguyễn Thái Ngọc Duy <pclouds@xxxxxxxxx> --- unpack-trees.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/unpack-trees.c b/unpack-trees.c index 5268de7af5..3ace82ca27 100644 --- a/unpack-trees.c +++ b/unpack-trees.c @@ -1651,7 +1651,7 @@ static int verify_clean_subdirectory(const struct cache_entry *ce, memset(&d, 0, sizeof(d)); if (o->dir) d.exclude_per_dir = o->dir->exclude_per_dir; - i = read_directory(&d, &the_index, pathbuf, namelen+1, NULL); + i = read_directory(&d, o->src_index, pathbuf, namelen+1, NULL); if (i) return o->gently ? -1 : add_rejected_path(o, ERROR_NOT_UPTODATE_DIR, ce->name); @@ -1693,7 +1693,7 @@ static int check_ok_to_remove(const char *name, int len, int dtype, return 0; if (o->dir && - is_excluded(o->dir, &the_index, name, &dtype)) + is_excluded(o->dir, o->src_index, name, &dtype)) /* * ce->name is explicitly excluded, so it is Ok to * overwrite it. -- 2.18.0.rc0.333.g22e6ee6cdf
