Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Jonathan Tan wrote: >> The corresponding code for protocol v2 in process_acks() does not have >> the same problem, because the invoker of process_acks() >> (do_fetch_pack_v2()) proceeds immediately to processing the packfile > > nit: s/proceeds/procedes/ Whoops. My spellchecker deceived me. I even checked Wiktionary and found that it was a verb there and didn't bother to look at the definition: Misspelling of proceed You already had the right spelling. Sorry for the noise, Jonathan
