On 5 June 2018 at 21:58, Brandon Williams <bmwill@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 06/05, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote: >> Since Martin & Brandon both liked this direction I've fixed it >> up. >> >> Martin: I didn't want to be the author of the actual fix for the bug >> you found, so I rewrote your commit in 3/3. The diff is different, and >> I slightly modified the 3rd paragraph of the commit message & added my >> sign-off, but otherwise it's the same. > > Thanks for writing up a proper patch series for this fix. I liked > breaking up your diff into two different patches to make it clear that > all callers of refpsec_item_init relying on dieing. Me too. >> Martin Ågren (1): >> refspec: initalize `refspec_item` in `valid_fetch_refspec()` I was a bit surprised at first that this wasn't a "while at it" in the second patch, but on second thought, it does make sense to keep this separate. Thanks for picking this up and polishing it. Just noticed: s/initalize/initialize/. That would be my fault... Martin
