Re: [PATCH 3/3] builtin-add: simplify (and increase accuracy of) exclude handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 05:01:23PM +0200, Jonas Fonseca wrote:

> Thanks for looking into this and making these patches. :)

No problem. I had run it across it before and it was on my "look into
this" list...thank you for providing a test case. :)

> I think you could even get rid of has_ignored with something like this.

Nope, I had originally wanted to do that, but the dir_struct.ignored
list contains _all_ ignored items, not just those that were originally
in the pathspec. The prune_ignored call sets uninteresting ones to
NULL.  That function could compact the list and re-set ignored_nr, but
it doesn't currently do so.

An even more elegant solution would be for read_directory to mark
whether an ignored file comes from a pathspec, or was found through
recursion. That would be more efficient, and it would remove the
prune_ignored thing, which is IMHO a little hack-ish.

I don't have time to work on it now, but I might look at it more tonight
or tomorrow (but please, if you are interested, take a crack at it).

-Peff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe git" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux