Re: does a new repo actually *need* default template content?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, May 28, 2018 at 07:56:12PM +0200, Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason wrote:

> 
> On Mon, May 28 2018, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> 
> >   (apologies for more pedantic nitpickery, just little things i'm
> > running across in my travels. aside: i actually teach git courses, so
> > it's a bit embarrassing that i don't know some of this stuff. *sigh*.)
> 
> Aside from maybe the empty branches/ directory (see c8a58ac5a5 ("Revert
> "Don't create the $GIT_DIR/branches directory on init"", 2009-10-31)),
> none of this is needed.
> 
> I wish we didn't create any of this stuff, but have never been inclined
> to make that my hill to die on.
> 
> I think we're much better off just shipping e.g. a single README file in
> hooks/, or just nothing at all.

FWIW, that's my opinion, too (including the "hill to die on" part).

I also wish hooks were just shell snippets in the config files that
could follow the usual config-precedence rules.

-Peff



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Development]     [Gcc Help]     [IETF Annouce]     [DCCP]     [Netdev]     [Networking]     [Security]     [V4L]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux SCSI]     [Fedora Users]

  Powered by Linux